Log in

No account? Create an account
The Villages

Date: 2008-09-09 22:50
Subject: the end of the world is nigh. or not
Security: Public
Location:the utility room in the sky
Mood:half asleephalf asleep
Music:sisters of mercy
It can't have escaped anyone's notice that the Large Hadron Collider at CERN goes live tomorrow. Nor can it have escaped anyone's notice that there have been dire warnings about what the thing will do, from creating `mini-black holes' which will destroy the Earth, to bizarre particles called `strangelets,' which will also destroy the Earth and probably the rest of Creation. It's been in all the papers for the past few weeks - even the tabs - and the BBC have been running a series of very informative and interesting programmes about what is the largest science experiment ever created by Man.
We were driving back from the veterinary hospital today and listening to Virgin Radio, and the DJ was talking about this, with all the scientific rigour you'd expect from a Virgin Radio DJ, and he mentioned that the bookmaker William Hill is actually offering odds that the world will end tomorrow because of the LHC.
Now then, all this end-of-the-world hysteria is getting on my tits and I became very annoyed indeed when I heard William Hill were offering odds. Because William Hill, being a venerable institution and not run by assholes, must have done their homework and they know as well as I do that the world will not end tomorrow. Tomorrow the big brains at CERN will switch on one of the proton beams in the LHC, I presume to calibrate it. This will not cause the world to end. Then, a few days later, they'll switch on the contrarotating beam, again, I presume, to calibrate it. This also will not cause the world to end. They're not going to start experiments until next month, and the damn thing won't reach full capacity until sometime in 2010. And even then I wouldn't put money on the world ending, no matter what odds William Hill are offering.
Of course, I've noticed no one mentioning that, in order to collect your winnings, the world actually has to end. Which would kind of be the ultimate pyrrhic victory, wouldn't it?
Post A Comment | 6 Comments | | Flag | Link

User: squirrel_monkey
Date: 2008-09-09 22:22 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
You better bookmark this one: http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/
Reply | Thread | Link

User: hutch0
Date: 2008-09-09 22:40 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
ROFLOL. Of course, as anyone will tell you, my record of predictions here has never been very good.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

User: (Anonymous)
Date: 2008-09-10 07:42 (UTC)
Subject: end of world
There will of course be bookies in heaven where punters who backed the world to end will be able to collect their winnings - but they will be staffed by bookmakers, for whom working in heaven where punters only back winners will be purgatory! graham sharpe (media relations director, william hill.
Reply | Thread | Link

User: hutch0
Date: 2008-09-10 21:22 (UTC)
Subject: Re: end of world
Hey, Graham! Good of you to drop by. So, just out of interest, how many bets did you take that the world would end this morning?
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

(no subject) - (Anonymous)
Kat: crying
User: artykat
Date: 2008-09-10 18:58 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Oh, blast! It was so much more fun while I was entertaining the idea of a giant dinner party in your sink!
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

User: hutch0
Date: 2008-09-10 21:21 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
You had a giant to dinner? No wonder there were so many pans.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

the villages
the links
December 2013
the promo