Log in

No account? Create an account
heroes fit for homes - The Villages

Date: 2007-08-29 16:13
Subject: heroes fit for homes
Security: Public
Mood:incandescent with rageincandescent with rage
Ben Parkinson is 23 years old and he's a Lance Bombardier with the 7th Parachute Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery.
Last September, he was serving in Afghanistan when he was gravely injured in a landmine explosion. He lost both legs, suffered injuries to his brain, spleen and chest, and fractures to his head, face, pelvis and spine. He wasn't expected to survive, and indeed he's thought to be one of the most gravely-wounded British soldiers ever to survive his injuries.
How did we take care of him when he came home? We took care of him like this. The bureaucratic bean-counters at the MoD granted Ben, who will need round-the-clock care for the rest of his life, just £152,000 in compensation.
It's no wonder his mother describes it as an insult. Our flat's worth more than that. There are footballers earning more than that a week.

The MoD, trying to claw back some credibility, says that the one-off payment and tax-free payments when he leaves the Army "could exceed £1 million over his lifetime." Well whoopee fucking doo. He's 23 years old; if by some miracle he does get the right care he could live another forty years. Will that million quid stretch that far, considering his nursing needs?

This is not new. It says something about Britain that it took a comedy programme to sum this bloody scandal up, but a few years ago Uncle Albert, a character in Only Fools And Horses was talking about the Second World War, and the men who came back dreadfully injured, hoping their country would look after them, and he said, "They promised us homes fit for heroes, and what did we get? Heroes fit for homes."

I don't know why Ben Parkinson joined the Army and I don't know what he thought about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but I do know we owe him better than this. If this is how we treat our wounded servicemen - and Ben's case is not the only one - we don't deserve to have an Army.
Post A Comment | 2 Comments | | Link

User: (Anonymous)
Date: 2007-08-30 22:22 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Each individual's story brings into clearer and sharper focus that war is hell and that conventional political institutions are simply ill-equipped to provide satisfactory solutions.

The question begs itself. So what can I do to help? Will I help that individual's family for the next forty years, running errands, providing breaktime for the caregivers, sending positive thoughts their way? Will I request that my taxes be raised to fund these things properly?

That is why I do the work I do and my husband does the work he does. The "real" solutions to such travesties lie in that which is considered naive, infeasible, and too difficult to implement. I will not "bore" the other villagers with it, but you, Hutch, know to which I refer.

“Anyone can become angry - that is easy, but to be angry with the right person at the right time, and for the right purpose and in the right way - that is not within everyone's power and that is not easy.” -- Aristotle
Reply | Thread | Link

hutch0: Honey Badger
User: hutch0
Date: 2007-09-01 00:09 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Keyword:Honey Badger
I know of what you refer to, and the cynical part of me thinks it won't make a blind bit of difference; governments will always exploit people and then cast them aside when they're no longer useful. I hope you mentioned this to Mike, because it needs to be brought to the widest possible attention. I'm enormously angry about this thing. This is how we treat our fallen, and it's dishonourable and just plain wrong.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

the villages
the links
December 2013
the promo